On Cloudsurfer 7 vs Saucony Ride 17: Which Daily Trainer Wins?
On Running and Saucony take fundamentally different approaches to building a daily trainer, and the Cloudsurfer 7 and Ride 17 are the clearest expression of those philosophies. Both are popular, well-reviewed shoes at similar price points. Both are aimed at the same type of runner. They could not feel more different.
This comparison breaks down where each shoe wins, where each falls short, and which one you should actually buy.
Some links in this article are affiliate links. SoleHunt may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
At a glance
| On Cloudsurfer 7 | Saucony Ride 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (men's size 9) | 258 g | 270 g |
| Heel drop | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Heel stack | 32 mm | 36 mm |
| Midsole foam | CloudTec+ Helion | PWRRUN+ |
| Energy return | ~65% | ~72% |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Width options | D only | B, D, 2E |
| MSRP | ~$170 | ~$145 |
The midsole story
This is where the two shoes diverge fundamentally. On's CloudTec+ Helion foam uses a cloud-shaped pod geometry on the outsole that compresses individually on landing, then snaps back. The intention is precise, targeted cushioning at each point of contact. In practice, the ride feels lighter and more ground-sensitive than a conventional foam midsole.
Saucony's PWRRUN+ is a nitrogen-infused TPEE foam that prioritises energy return. At approximately 72% energy return, it is noticeably springier than the Cloudsurfer's Helion compound. Step into a Ride 17 and it feels alive. There is a bounce to it that most daily trainers do not have.
These are genuinely different sensory experiences. Runners who love the Cloudsurfer say it feels precise and connected. Runners who love the Ride 17 say it feels energetic and propulsive. Neither description is wrong.
Cushioning: which absorbs more?
For pure impact absorption, the Ride 17 wins. The higher stack height (36 mm vs 32 mm) and the higher energy return foam together provide more protection per stride. The Cloudsurfer's pods do a reasonable job of absorbing the initial impact, but the total foam volume is lower.
For runners who prioritise impact absorption — high-mileage weeks, recovery runs, long slow distances — the Ride 17 is the better choice.
Responsiveness: which feels faster?
Counterintuitively, both shoes can claim this. The PWRRUN+ foam in the Ride 17 returns more energy (72% vs 65%), which makes it feel snappier at moderate paces. But the Cloudsurfer's lower weight (258 g vs 270 g) and lighter-feeling ride make it feel quicker for shorter, faster efforts.
In practice: the Ride 17 is the better moderate-tempo shoe because the foam propels you forward. The Cloudsurfer is the better speed-adjacent shoe because it does not feel heavy underfoot at faster cadences.
Fit and upper
The Cloudsurfer 7 has a more precise, athletic fit. The heel is snug, the midfoot wraps firmly, and the toebox is moderate. Runners with narrow to medium feet tend to love it. Runners with wider feet or who want extra toebox room often find it pinches.
The Ride 17 has a more generous fit — the standard D width is naturally wider than most brands' standard. It also comes in B (narrow) and 2E (wide) options, giving it significantly more versatility. If your feet are wider than average, the Ride 17 is the only option here.
Durability
Both shoes hold up well to regular use. The Cloudsurfer's CloudTec pods are more resilient than they look — the rubber is durable and the foam does not pack out quickly. Expect 600-700 km.
The Ride 17's PWRRUN+ foam has strong durability for a performance compound. Expect 600-700 km also. They are essentially equal on durability.
Price
The Cloudsurfer 7 typically retails at $170 or higher. The Ride 17 sits at $145. For $25 less, the Ride 17 offers more foam, more energy return, and more width options. The Cloudsurfer's premium is entirely about the brand identity and the distinctive ride feel.
Who should buy the Cloudsurfer 7
- Runners who want a lighter-feeling, ground-sensitive daily trainer
- Those with narrow to medium-width feet who like a precise, athletic fit
- Runners who have been looking for a way into On Running and want their most refined daily trainer
- Anyone who finds conventional foam midsoles feel too plush or disconnected
Who should buy the Ride 17
- Runners who want the most energetic daily trainer foam currently available
- Those with medium to wide feet
- High-mileage runners who need more stack height and cushioning protection
- Runners who want the best value-for-money in the premium daily trainer category
- Anyone who does occasional moderate-tempo work in their daily shoe
The verdict
For most runners, the Saucony Ride 17 is the better shoe. It has more foam, more energy return, more width options, and a lower price. The PWRRUN+ midsole is one of the best daily trainer foams on the market, and the fit is accommodating enough for the majority of feet.
The On Cloudsurfer 7 is the right choice if you specifically want the On running experience — the distinctive CloudTec feel and the lighter, more ground-connected ride. That is a real preference and worth paying for if it matches how you like shoes to feel.
If you are between them: order both, run in each for a few minutes on an indoor surface, and keep the one your feet prefer. Both are genuinely good shoes, and the difference comes down to personal ride preference more than objective quality.
For runners who want a comparison benchmark: the Brooks Ghost 16 is softer and more forgiving than both but less energetic than the Ride 17. The Hoka Clifton 9 offers rocker geometry that neither of these shoes has.